Matthijs, M. & McNamara K., (2015), “The Euro Crisis’ Theory Effect: Northern Saints, Southern Sinners, and the Demise of the Eurobond”, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp. 229-245.
Of the multiple narratives EU policymakers could have chosen at the onset of the euro crisis, why did austerity and structural reform win out over other plausible cures for member states’ problems? Arguably, sovereign debt pooling or more federalized economic governance would have been a solution to member states’ national deficits and competitiveness woes. To understand this puzzle, we draw on the sociology of knowledge literature. We argue that the response to the euro crisis was heavily informed by broader social logics that constructed the problem and the solution heavily toward ordoliberal and neoliberal ideas. Mapping the fate of the Eurobond proposals allows us to trace the complex entanglement of economic policy-making and parse out the ways in which social realities are shaped to make particular policy choices seem inevitable, even as they are themselves the product of social processes.
Relevant Posts
- Frankel, J. (2014) “The ECB Should Do QE, Mario? Buy US Bonds, Not Eurobonds“, Άρθρο Γνώμης, VoxEU Organisation, 24 March.
- Favero, Carlo, Missale, Alessandro, (2012),‘Sovereign spreads in the eurozone: which prospects for a Eurobond?’, Economic Policy, Vol. 27, Issue 70, p.p. 231 – 273.